Spanish scientists have unveiled the environmental costs of egg production on a typical farm in the country, where 93% of laying hens are still caged compared to the much lower EU average of 40%.
Spain is one of the largest egg producers in the European Union, with 1,260 farms and an average of 67,000 birds per unit. Together with neighbouring France, the country represents about 25% of the 7 million tons of egg produced each year in the EU.
The researchers, from the University of Oviedo, wanted to look at the environmental impact of the Spanish egg industry, which generates negatives effects in nature, such as greenhouse gas emissions and soil and water contamination.
They undertook the research, saying that few studies had focused on the impact of laying hen farms on ecosystems despite increasing concerns of the effects of intensive livestock production.
The research team took as a model an intensive poultry farm located in Asturias, which has 55,000 laying hens and an annual production of 13m eggs.
They analysed the effect of intensive egg production on 18 environmental categories, including:
The analysis, published in the Journal of Cleaner Production, showed the greatest impacts in 16 of the analysed categories were derived from the production of the feed supplied to the laying hens.
Amanda Laca, a researcher at the Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Technology, said: “Then most affected have been the transformation of the natural earth and the water and land toxicity. The choice of the ingredients that constitute the feed is a key factor.”
Another factor that generates important harmful effects is the replacement of the older hens by new layers.
“An increase in the useful life of the layers would contribute to reduce the derived impacts, although this factor must be treated together with economic and productive aspects,” she said.
The effects associated with the manufacture of materials used in egg packaging also harmed the environment, she said.
One of the more surprising findings in the report was that emissions of methane, ammonia and nitrous oxide and electricity, water and cleaning products barely contributed to the total impacts generated.
The scientists obtained a carbon footprint per dozen eggs of 2.7kg of carbon dioxide equivalent, which was described as “a value similar to other basic foods of animal origin such as milk and much lower than that of veal, pork or lamb.”
While there were a number of negative impacts on the environment, the researcher said “it was important to highlight the beneficial effect that the recycling of waste has on the environment as well as the use of elder chickens as poultry meat for human consumption.”
"*" indicates required fields
Notifications
Your Privacy Matters
It's your legal right to choose which information a website may store and have access to. With your permission, we and our third-party partners (19) store and/or access information on a device, such as unique identifiers in cookies and browsing data to collect and process personal data.
We and our partners do the following data processing:
Store and/or access information on a device, Advertising based on limited data and advertising measurement, Personalised content, content measurement, audience research, and services development
If you accept any or all of these, you will have agreed to this website's use of cookies for these purposes. You may also choose to refuse consent, but certain personalized features of the site won't be available to you.